Legislation/Guidance in Effect
Title |
Key Dates |
Nature of |
ESG Category |
Summary |
Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes Announces Exit from Investigation into ESG Investment Practices |
Adopted and in effect |
Attorney General Position |
Affirmatively Not Restricting ESG |
■ Democratic attorney general announces that Arizona will stop participating in investigations into the ESG practices of financial institutions. "Corporations should be permitted to access capital markets in ways that they feel are necessary for the advancement of their investor objectives and for society, as long as they are doing so in a lawful manner," Mayes said. |
Arizona Treasurer Kimberly Yee's Statement on BlackRock Divestments | Adopted and in effect 12/8/2022 | Enforcement / Divestment | Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■ As announced by Arizona State Treasurer Yee, "At the beginning of this year, I led in the national divestment effort to remove any exposure we had with BlackRock. In February of 2022, my office divested more than $543 million from BlackRock money market funds and reduced our direct exposure to BlackRock by 97% this year...The divestment was the result of a review by our internal Investment Risk Management Committee (IRMC) that began in the fourth quarter of 2021. Part of the review by IRMC involved reading the annual letters by CEO Larry Fink, which in recent years, began dictating to businesses in the United States to follow his personal political beliefs. In short, BlackRock moved from a traditional asset manager to a political action committee. “Our internal investment team believed this moved the firm away from its fiduciary duty in general as an asset manager. Once the review was completed, I approved the IRMC proposal to stop using money market funds by BlackRock and reduce Arizona's Treasury exposure to BlackRock in a prudent fashion." SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS |
Arizona Treasury Kimberly Yee Announced Newly Adopted Investment Policy Statement That Protects Taxpayer Dollars from ESG Policies |
Adopted and in effect |
IPS Revisions |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ The updated investment policy statement of the state treasurer's office has been amended to now require that all investments by or on behalf of the state treasurer be based on a fiduciary standard of care and only consider pecuniary factors when evaluating an investment or discharging its duties with respect to the investment policy statement. |
(Now Former) Arizona Attorney General Announces Action to Stop Coercive Investment Practices |
Adopted and in effect |
Enforcement / Divestment |
Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■ Announced an investigation by the Arizona attorney general's office regarding the ESG investment practices and Climate Action 100+ membership of large investment companies. |
Pending Legislation
Title |
Key Dates |
Nature of |
ESG Category |
|
HB2457/SB1013: Government Investments; Products
|
Introduced 1/17/2024 |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Requires any fiduciary to a state or municipal plan to discharge its duties solely in the interest of the participants and beneficiaries for the exclusive purpose of providing pecuniary benefits, defraying reasonable expenses of administering the plan and earning a return on the investment. ■ Fiduciaries shall only take into account pecuniary factors when evaluating investments or discharging their duties, and not consider nonpecuniary factors. Pecuniary factors means any factor that has a material effect on the financial risk or financial return of an investment based on appropriate investment horizons consistent with a plan's investment objectives and funding policy. Nonpecuniary factors includes anything that is intended to further or is branded, advertised or otherwise publicly described as furthering (a) international, domestic or industry agreements relating to environmental or social goals (i.e., Net Zero (NZAM) or Climate Action 100 initiatives/pledges), (b) corporate governance structures based on social characteristics or (c) social or environmental goals. ■ Also requires proxy voting to be based solely on pecuniary factors and may not be voted to further ESG benefits or goals. The plan also may not entrust any assets to a fiduciary that has a practice of engaging with or committing to engage with a company based on nonpecuniary factors. A fiduciary may not adopt a practice of following the recommendations of a proxy advisory firm or service provider unless the provider's proxy voting guidelines are consistent with the fiduciary's obligations to act based only on pecuniary factors. |
SB1014: Business; Discrimination Prohibition; Social Criteria
|
Introduced 1/8/2024 |
Legislation |
Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores
|
■ Prohibits financial institutions, insurers, and credit reporting agencies doing business in Arizona, either directly or through a contractor, from discriminating against any person based on a political affiliation, or other social credit, environmental, social, or governmental score or similar values-based or impact criteria. ■ A "financial institution" means banks, trust companies, savings and loan associations, credit unions, consumer lenders, international banking facilities and financial institution holding companies under the jurisdiction of the department. ■ Allows a financial institution to offer investments, products or services to a potential customer or investor that include subjective standards, if the standards are fully disclosed and explained before entering into a contract for the investments, products or services. |
Past/Inactive Legislation
Title |
Key Dates |
Nature of |
ESG Category |
Summary |
SB1612: Investments; Financial Institutions; State Treasurer |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■ Allows the state treasurer to cancel state contracts with financial institutions that have written ESG policies boycotting fossil fuels. Allows the attorney general to investigate such financial institutions. Prohibits public entities from investing in or with such financial institutions. |
SB1138: Business; Discrimination Prohibition; Social Criteria |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■ Prohibits financial institutions, including insurers and credit agencies doing business in Arizona, either directly or through a contractor, from discriminating against any person based on political affiliation, social credit, ESG, or similar value-based or impact criteria. |
SB1500: Government Investments; Fiduciaries; Pecuniary Benefit |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Requires that all state investments be made in the sole interest of the beneficiary taxpayer. Requires a fiduciary of a state plan to consider only pecuniary factors when evaluating an investment or discharging duties with respect to a plan. |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Prohibits a public entity from conditioning, entering into, or renewing a contract with a company based on the fact that such company implements an ESG Standards Policy. |
|
HB2471/SB1139: Government Investments; Plans; Fiduciaries; Products |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Authorizes the state treasurer to maintain a list of state investments. Requires all state investments to be made in the sole interest of the beneficiary taxpayer. Prohibits the state treasurer from taking unnecessary investment risks or promoting non-pecuniary benefits or other non-pecuniary social goals. SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS ■ SB1139 did not pass the House and was being reconsidered on 4/5/2023. |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■ Prohibits state public entities from entering into a contract with a company for the purchase of goods or services worth at least $100,000 unless the company verifies in writing that it does not discriminate against firearms entities or trade associations and will not do so during the contract term. Applies to companies with 10-plus full-time employees. |
|
HB2656: Certain Affiliations; Discrimination Prohibited; Statewide Concern |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2022 legislative session |
Legislation |
Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■ Prohibits financial institutions doing business in Arizona from discriminating against persons based on political affiliation and other social credit, ESG-related, or similar values-based or impact criteria. |
Introduced, but did not pass in the 2022 legislative session |
Legislation |
Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■ Prohibits public entities from signing contracts worth $100,000 or greater with a company unless the contract includes a written certification that the company does not currently, and agrees for the duration of the contract not to, discriminate against a firearms entity. |