2024 Upcoming Elections
- Governor – incumbent (Republican) term-limited
- Atty. General – incumbent (Republican) running for full term
- Sec. of State – incumbent (Republican) not running
- Treasurer – incumbent (Republican) running for full term
Legislation/Guidance in Effect
Title |
Key Dates |
Nature of |
ESG Category |
|
Adopted and in effect |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Urges the state of Missouri to exercise all of its authority to prevent a forced imposition of ESG policies denying access to financial services to citizens and lawful businesses and to join together with other states sharing this commitment. Urges the governor and all executive officers to exercise all discretion to ensure that the federal government, domestic or international organizations or agreements, or other entities coercing environmental or other ESG policies do not impose costs and consequences on the citizens of Missouri, do not deprive citizens of their constitutional freedoms and the guarantees of due process of law and equal treatment under the law, and do not infringe on the sovereignty of Missouri. Urges state officials to oppose forthcoming SEC regulations, the implementation of the Executive Order on Climate-Related Financial Risk, and any other top-down, one-size-fits-all environmental mandate. Urges Missouri state agencies to not base any action or decision upon the assumption that a transition to "net zero" is likely to occur. SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS ■ Adopted by House on 5/12/2023 |
|
Treasurer Fitzpatrick Announces MOSERS Has Pulled $500 Million in State Pension Funds from BlackRock |
Adopted and in effect |
Treasurer Position |
Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■The Missouri State Treasurer announced that the Missouri State Employees' Retirement System (MOSERS) has sold all public equities managed by BlackRock, pulling approximately $500 million in pension funds from the investment manager. According to the press release, at the MOSERS Board of Trustees meeting in June 2022, the MOSERS board directed staff to require BlackRock to abstain from voting proxies on behalf of the plan due to BlackRock's ESG-related public statements. BlackRock refused, and MOSERS proceeded with the sale of all of its equity holdings with the manager. |
Incoming Missouri State Auditor Outlines Plans to Combat ESG Policies |
Introduced 11/30/2022 |
Treasurer Position | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ The State Treasurer who was elected to be the state auditor expressed his opposition to ESG investing and his goals for opposing it, stating: "“There’s going to be legislation in Missouri this coming session dealing with ESG issues and proxy voting, and things like that. So, as somebody who’s been very involved in that conversation at the board level on a pension plan, as well as having been exposed to it a lot through my engagements with the State Financial Officers Foundation, with [The Heritage Foundation], with you guys, the stuff that I’ve been able to learn, I’m going to be a part of that legislative process in helping develop that legislation,” Fitzpatrick said. ■ The incoming Missouri state auditor explained why he’s against the use of ESG policies, stating, "Essentially, the reason I am against ESG being used as a tool for investing purposes is because it prioritizes nonfinancial factors in investment decisions, and how you’re managing people’s investments, over those financial—or what we call pecuniary—factors that should be the priority when you’re managing somebody else’s money and have a responsibility to them to generate the best return possible on their investment. |
Past/Inactive Legislation
Title |
Key Dates |
Nature of |
ESG Category |
|
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Modifies provisions relating to fiduciary duties for investments of public employee retirement systems by specifying how fiduciaries (i) may not consider ESG characteristics in a manner that would override his or her fiduciary duties as described in this section; (ii) may not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates to invest with environmentally, socially, or other non-economically motivated influence unless such mandates are consistent with the fiduciary's responsibility as provided in this section or as provided in the system's governing statutes, ordinances, charter, or documents with respect to the investment of system assets or other duties imposed by law relating to the investment, management, deposit, or custody of system assets; and (iii) may not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates for divestment from any indirect holdings in actively or passively managed investment funds or in private assets. ■ Additionally, the bill proposes that all shares of common stock held directly by a system shall be voted solely in the economic interest of the participants of the system. Voting shares for the purposes of furthering noneconomic environmental, social, political, ideological, or other goals is prohibited. Voting proxies by an investment manager or proxy voting service provider is permissible if the entity has committed in writing to vote the shares pursuant to proxy voting guidelines chosen by the system or has committed in writing to vote the shares in a manner consistent with the obligation to act solely in the economic interest of the participants of the system. |
|
SCR37: Expresses Concern Regarding Policies that Undermine Core Values and Interests of Missouri's Residents | Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session | Senate Resolution | Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores | ■ Expresses the concern of the General Assembly regarding policies of international organizations that advocate for policies that could undermine the core values and interests of Missouri's residents, including placing ESG restrictions on businesses leading to increased regulatory costs. |
SB1518: Creates New Provisions Prohibiting Discrimination Against Businesses Based on ESG Scores | Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session | Legislation | Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■ This act is identical to SB 177 (2023), SB 316 (2023), and the introduced SB 1171 (2022) and similar to SB 50 (2023). ■ This act prohibits any public entity from discriminating or giving preferential treatment to any bidder, offeror, contractor, or subcontractor, when engaged in procuring or letting contracts for any purpose, based on an environmental, social and governance score, as defined in the act. It also prohibits any LLC or corporation from being discriminated against or given preferential treatment based on an environmental, social and governance score. ■ The term ""environmental, social, and governance score"" means an evaluation conducted by an entity that takes into consideration one or more of the following: (1) The use of energy and raw materials by the LLC; (2) Whether the LLC spends funds on social welfare or makes charitable donations; (3) The wages and working hours of the employees of the LLC; (4) The environmental policies of the LLC; (5) The bribery and corruption policies of the LLC; and (6) The information transparency of the LLC. |
HB2799: Establishing Provisions Relating to Investment Disclosures |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Amends Chapter 409, adding one new section that covers investment disclosure ■ Requires written consent and prior disclosure if an investment advisor, representative or broker-dealer incorporate a nonfinancial or social objective into recommendations to client |
SB1397/HB2778: Creates Provisions Relating to Firearms Discrimination |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Target Entities That Boycott Certain Industries | ■ Prohibits Missouri public entities from entering into a contract with a company for the purchase of goods or services worth at least $100,000 and paid at least partly from public funds unless the company verifies in writing that it does not discriminate against firearms entities or trade associations and will not do so during the contract term. Only applies to companies with at least 10 full-time employees. Does not apply to a public entity that contracts with a sole-source provider or does not receive a bid from a company that is able to provide written verification of the above." |
SB1350: Prohibits Giving Preferential Treatment or Discrimination Based upon ESG Scores |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■Provides that the board of trustees of a public retirement system and any of its fiduciaries shall discharge its duties solely in the financial interest of the participants and beneficiaries for the executive purposes of (a) providing financial benefits to participants and their beneficiaries; and (b) defraying reasonable expenses of administering the system. A fiduciary shall take into account only financial factors when discharging his or her duties with respect to a public retirement system. ■ Unless no economically practicable alternative is available, public retirement system assets shall not be entrusted to a fiduciary unless that fiduciary has a practice of, and in writing commits to, following guidelines, when engaging with portfolio companies and voting shares or proxies, that match the board of trustees' obligation to act solely upon financial factors. ■ Unless no economically practicable alternative is available, the board of trustees or any of its fiduciaries shall not adopt a practice of following the recommendations of a proxy advisor or other service provider unless such advisor or service provider has a practice of, and in writing commits to, following proxy voting guidelines that match the board of trustees' obligation to act solely upon financial factors. |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ This act modifies provisions relating to duties of fiduciaries for public employee retirement systems. Specifically, investment fiduciaries are required to: (1) Not consider environmental, social, or governance characteristics in a manner that would override his or her fiduciary duties; (2) Not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates to invest with environmentally, socially, or other noneconomically motivated influence unless the mandates are consistent with the fiduciary's responsibility or as provided in the system's governing statutes, ordinances, charter, or documents with respect to the investment of system assets or other duties imposed by law relating to the investment, management, deposit, or custody of system assets; (3) Not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates for divestment from any indirect holdings in actively or passively managed investment funds or in private assets; and (4) Not be prohibited from closing records related to information in connection with investments in or financial transactions with business entities. ■ Additionally, this act provides that all shares of common stock held directly by a retirement system shall be voted solely in the economic interest of participants of the system. Voting shares for the purposes of furthering noneconomic environmental, social, political, ideological, or other goals is prohibited. The act creates provisions on proxy voting for such purposes. ■ These provisions are identical to provisions in SB 827 (2024), are substantially similar to provisions in SB 1113 (2024), HB 769 (2023), and in HCS/HB 863 (2023) and is similar to provisions in HCS/HB 2431 (2024). |
|
HB1620: Reviews of Presidential Executive Orders |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ This bill relates to executive orders issued by the President of the U.S. The bill allows the state's house of representatives to review an executive order issued by the President and not passed into law by the U.S. Congress. The state's house of representatives may refer such orders to the state AG and Governor for further review. The bill requires the AG to determine whether an order is constitutional and to decide whether to seek an exemption from the order or a ruling on its constitutionality. ■ The bill prohibits the state, a political subdivision of the state, or any publicly funded organization from enforcing a presidential executive order that restricts a person’s rights or which the AG has determined to be unconstitutional and which is related to certain enumerated subjects, including: (i) the regulation of business activities or personal behaviors during a pandemic or other public health emergency; (ii) the regulation of natural resources, including coal and oil; (iii) the regulation of the agriculture industry; (iv) the use of land; (v) the regulation of the financial sector as it relates to ESG standards; or (vi) the regulation of the constitutional right to keep and bear arms. |
HB1700: Modifies Provisions Relating to the Fiduciary Duty and Proxy Voting Activities of Public Retirement Systems |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Provides that the board of trustees of a public retirement system and any of its fiduciaries may not consider factors or take action to further social, political, or ideological interests. A fiduciary may reasonably be determined to have considered factors or taken action to further social, political, or ideological interests if they make a commitment to further eliminating, reducing, offsetting, or disclosing greenhouse gas emissions; divesting from, limiting investment in, or limiting the activities or investments of any company for failing, or not committing, to meet environmental standards or disclosures; access to abortion, sex or gender reassignment treatment, or transgender surgery; or Divesting from, limiting investment in, or limiting the activities or investments of any company that engages in, facilitates, or supports the manufacture, import, distribution, marketing or advertising, sale, or lawful use of firearms, ammunition, or components, parts, and accessories of firearms or ammunition. ■ A shares held directly or indirectly by or on behalf of the state retirement system or the participants shall be voted solely in the financial interests of the participants and their beneficiaries. Unless no economically practicable alternative is available, the board of trustees shall not grant proxy voting authority to any person who is not a part of the board of trustees unless that person has a practice of, and in writing commits to, following guidelines that match the board of trustees' obligation to act solely upon financial factors. ■ Unless no economically practicable alternative is available, public retirement system assets shall not be entrusted to a fiduciary unless that fiduciary has a practice of, and in writing commits to, following guidelines, when engaging with portfolio companies and voting shares or proxies, that match the board of trustees' obligation to act solely upon financial factors. ■ Unless no economically practicable alternative is available, the board of trustees or any of its fiduciaries shall not adopt a practice of following the recommendations of a proxy advisor or other service provider unless such advisor or service provider has a practice of, and in writing commits to, following proxy voting guidelines that match the board of trustees' obligation to act solely upon financial factors. |
HB1699: Prohibits state contracts with companies that engage in economic boycotts based on environmental, social, or governance criteria |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Target Entities That Boycott Certain Industries |
■ Prohibits state contracts with companies that engage in economic boycotts based on ESG criteria (other than for an ordinary business purpose). "Ordinary business purpose" refers to an action by a company that does not include any purpose to further social, political, or ideological interests. A company may reasonably be determined to have taken an action with a purpose to further social, political, or ideological interests based upon evidence indicating such a purpose including, but not limited to: (a) Branding, advertising, statements, explanations, reports, letters to clients, communications with portfolio companies, statements of principles, or commitments; or (b) Participation in, affiliation with, or status as a signatory to any coalition, initiative, joint statement of principles, or agreement. ■ The act applies only to a contract that: (1) Is between a governmental entity and a company with ten or more full-time employees; and (2) Is valued at $50,000 or more over the term of the contract that is to be paid wholly or partially from public funds of the governmental entity, provided that the provisions of this subsection shall apply separately to all companies in a multiple party contract. ■ A governmental entity may not enter into a contract with a company for goods or services unless the contract contains a written verification from the company that it: (1) Does not currently engage in any economic boycotts; and (2) Will not engage in any economic boycotts during the term of the contract. |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ Amends Section 105.688 to require investment fiduciaries when discharging his or her duties to: (1) not consider ESG characteristics in a manner that would override his or her fiduciary duties, (2) not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates to invest with environmentally, socially, or other noneconomically motivated influence unless they are consistent with the fiduciary's responsibility or other duties imposed by law, and (3) not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates for divestment from any indirect holdings in actively or passively managed investment funds or in private assets. ■ Adds new Section 105.962 requiring all shares of common stock held directly by a system to be voted solely in the economic interest of plan participants and prohibiting voting shares for the purpose of furthering noneconomic environmental, social, political, ideological, or other goals. All proxies associated with a system's directly held shares must be voted by internal system staff or by an investment manager or proxy voting service provider who has committed in writing to vote shares either pursuant to proxy voting guidelines chosen by the system or in a manner consistent with the obligation to act solely in the economic interest of plan participants. |
|
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics | ■ Requires written investment policies of the state and each political subdivision to include provisions requiring the investment of public funds to be based solely on pecuniary factors, as defined in the act. | |
SB835: Modifies Provisions Relating to Financial Instruments | Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session | Legislation | Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■ House Committee substitute bill removed the language about prohibitions on discriminating against vendors on the basis of ESG scores. |
SB827: Creates new provisions relating to social objective scoring standards |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■ Current law requires the State Treasurer to prepare, maintain, and adhere to a written investment policy. This act requires such policy to include provisions prohibiting the investment of state funds in any particular investment held by any entity that prioritizes a social objective or other nonfinancial objective into its discretionary business or investment decisions. ■ The act also modifies the responsibilities of investment fiduciaries. Specifically, investment fiduciaries shall be required to: (i) not consider ESG characteristics in a manner that would override his or her fiduciary duties; (ii) not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates to invest with environmentally, socially, or other non-economically motivated influence unless they are consistent with the fiduciary's responsibility or as provided in the system's governing statutes with respect to the investment of system assets or other duties imposed by law relating to the investment, management, deposit, or custody of system assets; and (iii) not be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates for divestment from any indirect holdings in actively or passively managed investment funds or in private assets. ■ All shares of common stock held directly by a retirement system shall be voted solely in the economic interest of plan participants. Voting shares for the purposes of furthering noneconomic environmental, social, political, ideological, or other goals is prohibited. The act creates provisions on proxy voting for such purposes. ■ These provisions are identical to HB 769 (2023) and provisions in HCS/HB 863 (2023). |
SB1142: Prohibits giving preferential treatment or discrimination based upon ESG scores |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2024 legislative session |
Legislation | Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■ The act requires the State Treasurer to create a Restricted Financial Institutions List, containing the names of financial institutions that are engaged in a boycott of companies because they engage in the exploration, production, utilization, transportation, sale, or manufacturing of fossil fuel-based energy, timber, mining, or agriculture; or because they fail to commit to certain environmental standards. The list is to be used by the Treasurer for the purpose of determining which financial institutions to enter into banking contracts with. The list must be updated annually and is required to be posted on the Treasurer's website and delivered to the Governor, the President Pro Tem of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives. The act permits the Treasurer to disqualify restricted financial institutions from the competitive bidding process or from any other official selection process for any banking contract. The Treasurer may refuse to enter into a banking contract or an extension of any banking contract with a restricted financial institution based on its restricted financial institution status. The Treasurer may require, as a term of any banking contract, an agreement by the financial institution not to engage in a boycott for the duration of the contract. ■ The act also requires public bodies to ensure that bidders, offerors, contractors, or subcontractors, when engaged in procuring or letting contracts for any purpose, are not given preferential treatment or discriminated against based on an ESG score. |
Target Entities That Boycott Certain Industries | ||||
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Allows the House of Representatives to review presidential orders and declare them unconstitutional, including the regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards. |
|
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Requires investment advisers and their representatives to disclose to and receive prior written consent from a client before incorporating social or other non-financial objectives into their recommendations, solicitations, or investment selections. |
|
HB863: Establishing requirements for municipal bonds receiving the Green Bond rating in this state |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Prohibits state agencies from publishing information, adopting laws or rules, or issuing guidelines for purposes of social credit scores or other ESG scores or metrics. |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Requires an investment fiduciary in certain public employee retirement and pension systems not to consider ESG characteristics in a manner that would override fiduciary duties; not to be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates to invest with environmentally, socially, or other non-economically motivated influence unless consistent with the fiduciary's responsibility; and not to be subject to any legislative, regulatory, or other mandates for divestment from any indirect holdings in actively or passively managed investment funds. |
|
HB 770: Prohibits use of environmental, social justice, or governance scores or metrics |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■No state agency shall share or publish information, adopt laws, promulgate rules, or issue guidelines for purposes of social credit scores or other environmental, social justice, or governance scores or metrics that restrict the ability of any industry, including agricultural operations, to offer products or services. No state agency shall require any person or business to adopt or operate in accordance with social credit scores or other environmental, social justice, or governance scores or metrics. |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Authorizes the General Assembly to review presidential orders and declare them unconstitutional, including the regulation of the financial sector through the imposition of environmental, social, or governance standards. |
|
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Restrict Use of ESG Factors; Focus on Pecuniary Characteristics |
■Requires an investment fiduciary to discharge his or her duties in the interests of the participants in a public employee retirement system and their beneficiaries for the exclusive purpose of providing financial benefits and paying reasonable expenses for administering the public employee retirement system. Additionally, requires an investment fiduciary to take into account only financial factors when discharging fiduciary duties. SUBSEQUENT DEVELOPMENTS Tracks the Heritage Foundation's "State Pension Fiduciary Duty Act" |
|
SB200: Creates provisions relating to firearms discrimination |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2023 legislative session |
Legislation |
Target Entities that Boycott Certain Industries |
■Prohibits Missouri public entities from entering into a contract with a company for the purchase of goods or services worth at least $100,000 and paid at least partly from public funds unless the company verifies in writing that it does not discriminate against firearms entities or trade associations and will not do so during the contract term. Only applies to companies with at least 10 full-time employees. |
SB50: Prohibits giving preferential treatment or discrimination based upon ESG scores |
Introduced, but did not pass in 2022 legislative session |
Legislation |
Prohibit Discrimination on Basis of Social Credit or ESG Scores |
■Prohibits any public entity from discriminating or giving preferential treatment to any company based on an ESG score when engaged in procuring or letting contracts for any purpose. |